Friedrich Naumann Foundation for liberal politics and democracy in Malaysia
    Home
    About Us
    FNF Principles
    FNF Offices
    Contact Us

Friedrich Naumann Foundation for liberal politics and democracy in Malaysia

Publications
Links
Archive
News & Articles
Democracy
Liberalism
Market Economy
Human Rights
Community Centre

Multimedia
RSS FNF Malaysia  What is RSS?

 BETA

Join our e-Newsletter

Calendar 2007
Friedrich Naumann Foundation Malaysia Calendar

Readers Comments

We invite YOU, our readers to send in your comments to us. Those that we find of interest will be published here on our web site.
Contact us

 Special Focus : Public Morality

Moral Value Versus Economic Development

Thai Beverages, a holding company owned by billionaire Charoen Sirivadhanabhakdi and brewer of Mekhong rum and Chang Beer, intends to list on the stock exchange with the aim to help raise the company’s profile and funds in anticipation of expansion abroad. The company hoped to raise more than $1bn in the April 2005 flotation, which would have been the largest by value in Thailand’s history and the first by a brewer. Market authorities considered the listing as an important step towards enlarging the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) and a move that would attract investors.

They argue that as long as the company had good corporate governance, solid earnings, transparency and good information disclosure, it can list on the stock market and that social issues must be separated from the capital market.

On the other hand, religious groups and social activists argued that allowing the listing to go forward was immoral and would undermine social values and effectively send a message that the state is supporting alcohol drinking. The listing undermines state policy to promote ethical development within society. It is feared that younger Thais will come to see these things as normal, something that grows with them and that adults give full support to the alcohol industry. These religious groups argued that alcohol is against Buddhism, Islam and traditional Thai culture and contradicts the moral value of Thai society.

The move by these religious groups and social activists may not have received so much public attention if they would not have secured a backing from Maj-Gen Chamlong Srimuang, an advisor on human resources to Thailand’s Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. Chamlong argued that listing of liquor and beer producing firms on the stock market would encourage Thais to drink more. Last year, he organized a similar “moral campaign” that forced Prime Minister Thaksin to abandon his plan to set up a public company to buy shares in a major English football club. His main argument was that if the share acquisition went through, it would encourage more Thais to gamble on football results which are already an addiction among young Thais. Chamlong is of the view that the moral fabric of Thai society need to be strengthened as the country faces the torrents of consumerism that come with globalization, and that economic progress must not be acquired at the expense of morality.

Taking Chamlong’s argument into consideration, it may seem like he has spoken out against government policies and actions that he considers to be harmful to the moral values of Thai society. However, one must bear in mind his current position as the Chairman of the Moral Centre or Centre for the Promotion of National Strength on Moral Ethics and Values, which is one of the eight units in the Office of Knowledge Management and Development Projects, noticeably initiated and supervised by the Prime Minister Thaksin.

In fact, there are many important issues that deserve more attention from the moral campaign, but be rather difficult to gain public consent, including the legalization of underground lottery, hidden prostitution and the legalization of casinos, that may come under the name of entertainment complex.

However one must pause to consider the other angle to this controversy: while Thailand allows foreign liquor to flow in freely to compete with local products in Thai market, we oppose our own liquor to list on our stock market which, if successful, would create job opportunity for many related business industries as well as bring in foreign currencies based on earnings of the company from its operation base abroad. Alcohol drinks are already available plenty in the market. Is it logical that the listing of Beer Chang would encourage the increase in alcohol consumption? Should not the increase in alcohol drink be prevented by other legal regulations and measures such as setting the age limit of buyers and limiting time and place of alcohol sales and limiting advertising time?


Home | About Us | FNF Principles | FNF Offices | Contact Us

Copyright © 2007 FNF Malaysia  •  Web Design & Hosting by: Web One Studio